A crisis hits your brand.
Customers are angry. Reporters are calling. Employees are looking for answers — fast.
Not every crisis looks the same, but that scenario alone is enough to send shivers down the spine of unprepared executives. Organizations that navigate these moments best aren’t the ones who improvise well. They are the ones who prepared well.
That preparation starts with a crisis communications plan.
But simply having a plan is not enough. The effectiveness of a plan depends on its structure, content, and adaptability. These are the elements that allow organizations to respond quickly, communicate clearly, and maintain trust during uncertain moments.
Here is how those pieces come together.
1. Structure: Define the Crisis Response Team
The first step in building a crisis plan is identifying the crisis response team.
Roles within that team must be clearly defined, with a documented chain of communication and established approval processes before messaging reaches the public.
It is critical that contingencies are accounted for.
- If the CEO is unreachable for the afternoon, who makes the final call in their place?
- If a reporter is on deadline, what authority does the spokesperson have to respond without executive review?
- If the situation escalates overnight, who activates the crisis plan?
These are not theoretical questions. They are common realities during a fast-moving crisis.
Decisions need to be made quickly and confidently. By establishing a clear structure in advance, precious time or costly delays won’t be wasted on internal bottlenecks.
In our experience advising partners through high-stakes communications, the biggest breakdowns rarely happen in public messaging. They happen internally, when teams are unclear about who is making decisions and how quickly those decisions should be made. These breakdowns are avoidable!
2. Content: Prepare the Core Communications
While structure defines who responds, the next step is preparing how the organization communicates. Because crises are unpredictable, its impossible to draft fully final statements in advance. Instead, a crisis communications plan should outline the key components that can be deployed quickly.
The Holding Statement
A holding statement is typically the first public communication an organization issues during a reputation-impacting situation. A holding statement should not say much by design, but it is important to acknowledge the situation and demonstrate that the organization is responding.
Example:
“We are aware of widespread service outages affecting customers statewide. Our team is working to restore service as quickly as possible. This is our foremost priority. Please monitor our website for updates as we work to resolve this matter. Thank you for your patience.”
Holding statements can be templated in advance but should always be customized to reflect the organization’s voice and the specific circumstances at hand.
Designate a Spokesperson
A crisis plan should also identify a primary spokesperson responsible for media inquiries. It’s the spokesperson’s job to communicate on the organization’s behalf, and do so in a way that is consistent with its values. This role typically falls to a communications leader or senior executive, who should be closely aligned with leadership and the crisis response team as the situation evolves.
Prepare for Public Inquiries
Crises generate questions from many audiences beyond the press, including customers, partners, and employees. It is also vital to have a contact point for non-media inquiries.
Organizations should plan for this influx by creating:
- A FAQ page on the company website
- A centralized, closely-monitored submission form for public questions.
- Regular updates across primary channels (your website, social media, intranet, etc.)
While it may not be possible to answer every request, providing a clear place for updates helps maintain transparency and trust.
3. Adaptability: Treat the Plan as a Living Document.
As detailed as crisis plans are, they must also be adaptable. Rather than something slow to change course, a crisis plan should be built for speed and agile enough to adjust quickly amid evolving circumstances and organizational learning. A plan should be reviewed at least every six months and following each crisis.
After every crisis situation, organizations should evaluate what worked and what did not.
For example:
- A digitally native brand may find video updates on social media more effective than traditional written statements.
- A company that deployed a large response team may determine that a smaller, faster decision group would improve response time.
The key is to be open to process improvements and opportunities that align with your organization’s strengths. The goal is to treat the crisis plan as a living document, and remain open to improvements at each step.
Prepared Organizations Respond Better
Crises are inevitable for most organizations. Reputation damage does not have to be.
With a clear structure, prepared communications, and a plan that evolves, organizations can respond quickly, communicate with confidence, and maintain trust during challenging moments.
If your organization is evaluating whether it is truly prepared, the team at Abel Communications is always happy to start that conversation. Want to get in touch? Start here!
